Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II
Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II and Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 EX DG APO Macro HSM II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9e57/b9e57dcdd165d0a0fa6f77b88301af47d836839b" alt=""
100% crop comparison at f2.8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84440/84440bfca50a30a604f0835d8cc3c099919b8ea7" alt=""
Note: on tripod, VR off, and both at same settings (ISO/f/s/l). Also all images are straight out of Nikon D90. No post-processing.
Reference images:
70mm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/057fe/057fe8509af513b7c685ebe462c3d7745ceee54d" alt=""
200mm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/434cc/434ccdaccd817ce2c82f56a7b39d12a86adfec76" alt=""
Other reference images:
Sigma at 200mm f2.8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de363/de363cb05ad7601d4ada49df0078b22e68a6e9cd" alt=""
Nikkor at 200mm f2.8 (VR Off)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5c3a/d5c3abc577f152d2d2f5da26c41ecbb0c237e75e" alt=""
Conclusion: Nikkor's image quality justifies its almost 3x price compared to Sigma HSM II (well, 1.5x for build quality and 1.5x for image quality).
100% crop comparison at f2.8
Note: on tripod, VR off, and both at same settings (ISO/f/s/l). Also all images are straight out of Nikon D90. No post-processing.
Reference images:
70mm
200mm
Other reference images:
Sigma at 200mm f2.8
Nikkor at 200mm f2.8 (VR Off)
Conclusion: Nikkor's image quality justifies its almost 3x price compared to Sigma HSM II (well, 1.5x for build quality and 1.5x for image quality).
Comments